Skip to the page

Company enrichment API benchmark 2026

Three boards, one table.

Three public benchmarks score company enrichment APIs. Apollo leads Firecrawl's at 89.3% on four fields. On Openbenchmarks' 282 companies, People Data Labs has the highest enrichment success, 89.0%, and Apollo the highest field accuracy, 92.6%. CompanyEnrich's own test measures coverage, not accuracy.

SpecStream is the live web data engine for teams and agents. It fills these fields from each company's own pages at 5¢ a row, with source URL and read time on every value, so you can score it on any board's public companies.

New accounts get $10 of credit, no card.

Scores and prices from the three boards

SpecStreamApolloPeople Data LabsCompanyEnrichParallelZoomInfo
Firecrawl: four common fields, 200 US companiesNot on this board. Its 102 public companies cost $5.10 at 5¢ a row89.3%80.6%Not on this boardNot on this boardNot on this board
Openbenchmarks: enrichment success, 282 companiesNot on this board. Its 282 companies cost $14.10 at 5¢ a row88.6%89.0%73.1%86.0%63.9%
Openbenchmarks: field accuracySource URL and read time on every value, so each field can be checked against the answer key's own source92.6%91.2%74.7%89.4%70.4%
Openbenchmarks: field coverageA field no page states is left empty, and a row SpecStream can't find costs nothing93.0%94.3%95.5%94.7%88.7%
CompanyEnrich's own test: find rate, 349 domainsNot on this board61.6%60.2%67.6%Not on this boardNot on this board
Price unit5¢ a row with up to 5 facts, 15¢ with up to 15. Quoted before the run, on every plan$0.0196 a credit$0.10 a match$0.0098 a credit on Starter$0.050 a request at medium reasoning$0.35 a new company record
Cost of the 282 Openbenchmarks companies$14.10$10.88$27.70$2.76$14.10$93.45

What the three benchmarks measure

Other providers on the boards

How SpecStream scores

The same numbers as the benchmarks page, from the official tasks and scorers.

How to start

Send a few domains and the fields from code. This call spends nothing: the 402 reply shows how SpecStream read the request, the columns and the most it can cost.

curl -i https://api.specstream.ai/v1/agent/lists \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"request": "For the companies at stripe.com, gusto.com and figma.com: the headquarters city, employee count, founded year, industry and LinkedIn page", "count": 3}'

For a whole list, import it in the workspace, or let your agent use the MCP server at https://api.specstream.ai/mcp with OAuth or an API key. New accounts get $10 of credit, no card. More on enriching a list and the company data API prices.

Frequently asked questions

Something we didn't answer? Talk to a human

Which company enrichment API is the most accurate?
Apollo, on both public boards that check values: 89.3% on Firecrawl's four headline fields and 92.6% field accuracy on Openbenchmarks. People Data Labs has the highest enrichment success on Openbenchmarks, 89.0%.
Is there an open company enrichment benchmark?
Yes, two publish their code and inputs: Openbenchmarks, with 282 companies and 11 APIs, and Firecrawl, with a 102 company public sample of its 200. CompanyEnrich publishes its raw provider output for its 349 domain coverage test.
Is SpecStream on these benchmarks?
No, SpecStream is not on the three boards as of Nov 12, 2026. Their public companies run through SpecStream for $5.10 (Firecrawl's 102) or $14.10 (Openbenchmarks' 282) at 5¢ a row, and each value comes back with its source URL and read time to score against the answer key.
How much does company enrichment cost per company?
SpecStream costs 5¢ a row with up to 5 facts. On the Openbenchmarks price table, CompanyEnrich is $0.0098 a credit, Apollo $0.0196 a credit, Parallel $0.050 a request, People Data Labs $0.10 a match and ZoomInfo $0.35 a new company record.
Which field is hardest to enrich?
Employee count. In Firecrawl's run it averaged 57% across providers, and when providers missed, they mostly guessed low. SpecStream returns the page each headcount was read on.
What is the difference between field accuracy and coverage?
Coverage is the share of fields a provider returned. Accuracy is the share of returned fields that were right. On Openbenchmarks, CompanyEnrich had 95.5% coverage and 74.7% accuracy, and Apollo 93.0% coverage and 92.6% accuracy.

Sources

SpecStream wrote this page. Each score and price comes from the benchmark or the vendor page named here, as published on the date shown.

  1. SpecStream pricingspecstream.ai/pricing, read Nov 12, 2026
  2. SpecStream for agentsspecstream.ai/agents.md, read Nov 12, 2026
  3. SpecStream enrichmentspecstream.ai/for/enrichment, read Nov 12, 2026
  4. SpecStream benchmarksspecstream.ai/benchmarks, read Nov 12, 2026
  5. Openbenchmarks company enrichment boardopenbenchmarks.com/company-enrichment, read Nov 12, 2026
  6. Openbenchmarks company enrichment repositorygithub.com/openbenchmarks-labs/company-enrichment, read Nov 12, 2026
  7. Firecrawl, best company enrichment APIsfirecrawl.dev/blog/best-company-enrichment-api, read Nov 12, 2026
  8. Firecrawl company enrichment benchmark repositorygithub.com/firecrawl/benchmark-company-enrichment, read Nov 12, 2026
  9. CompanyEnrich company enrichment benchmarkcompanyenrich.com/benchmarks/company-enrichment-api, read Nov 12, 2026
  10. CompanyEnrich pricingcompanyenrich.com/pricing, read Nov 12, 2026
  11. Coresignal pricingcoresignal.com/pricing/, read Nov 12, 2026